CO129-100 - Sir Robinson - 1864 [9] — Page 104

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

# SCHEDULE

From. 4

COPY OF CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE COLONIES AND THE GOVERNOR OF HONGKONG UPON THE SUBJECT OF THE MILITARY CONTRIBUTION.

No. Date. To. Page.

5 125th April 1863... 221st May 1863. 3 5th September 1863 410th November 1863] 2nd December 1863. 6 31st December 1863 716th February 1864 Sir F. Rogers Governor Sir H. Robinson 3 Governor Sir H. Robinson His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. Sir F. Rogers... 5 The Acting Governor of Hongkong.. 12 The Acting Governor of Hongkong.. His Grace the Duke of Newcastle 13 The Acting Governor of Hongkong.. His Grace the Duke of Newcastle 13 The Acting Governor of Hongkong. His Grace the Duke of Newcastle 18 His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. Governor Sir H. Robinson 19 8 9th April 1864... Governor Sir H. Robinson His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. 19 912th April 1864.... Governor Sir H. Robinson His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. 24 10 25th June 1864 The Right Honorable E. Cardwell Governor Sir H. Robinson 25

Cette-No. 1.- Copy of DET 14 from Sir F. ROGERS to Governor Sir H. ROBINSON.

Downing Street, 25th April, 1863.

SIR,

You are probably aware that the attention of Her Majesty's Government has been much occupied, during the last two years, by a consideration of the important subject of Colonial Military expenditure, and that an enquiry was instituted by a Committee of the House of Commons whether the most wealthy and important Colonies might not be called upon, with a due regard to justice and to their own interests, to defray a larger proportion of the cost of their Military defence than they had hitherto done.

After a thorough examination of the subject, it was decided that those Colonies which, as regards the cost of their Military defence, were more particularly a burden to the Imperial Exchequer should, (allowing of course that the state of their revenues was such as to justify the additional charge), be required considerably to increase their contributions towards that object.

In accordance with the decision Ceylon, Mauritius, and the principal Australian Colonies, will be called upon to contribute more liberally towards the support of the several detachments of Her Majesty's Troops which are maintained in those Colonies, chiefly for the protection of Colonial interests.

I make these few remarks, by the direction of the Duke of Newcastle, in order that you may be aware of what has already taken place in the matter, and for the purpose of bringing to your notice the fact that Colonies which have never to any great extent involved a heavy charge on the Imperial Treasury, excepting as regards a portion of the cost for their defence, will now be desired partly to relieve the revenues of this Country by making additional contributions in aid of their Military protection.

Under these circumstances it is not to be expected that a rich and flourishing Colony like Hongkong should any longer be allowed an immunity from such charges, on this account, as it may so justly be called upon to bear. But before taking any definite action in the matter, His Grace would be glad to be favoured with any remarks which you may have to make, and with this view, and in order that you may be the more easily enabled to furnish any suggestions which may occur to you, it will be necessary that I should briefly review the past and present financial state of the Colony.

It would appear, from an examination of all the data bearing on the subject, that, during the first fourteen years of its existence as a Colony, Hongkong cost the Imperial Exchequer no less a sum than £273,000 for its Civil Establishment, exclusive of any sum spent during that period on account of the Military and Naval Protection of the Colony. This very large expense to the mother country, even if the Colonial Revenues were in a far less flourishing condition than they are at present, would of itself be sufficient to impose on the Colony the obligation of a substantial contribution from local funds towards the cost of the Military defence of local interests. From the Official documents in this department, it has also been ascertained that the Colony became self-supporting, so far as its Civil Establishments were concerned, in 1859, and that Imperial aid was then withdrawn. It also appears that in that year £15,000 was expended on Public Works, Roads, &c. The Revenue and Expenditure for the three following years have been as follows:

Edit History

2026-05-19 07:29:52 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
# SCHEDULE From. 4 COPY OF CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE COLONIES AND THE GOVERNOR OF HONGKONG UPON THE SUBJECT OF THE MILITARY CONTRIBUTION. No. Date. To. Page. 5 125th April 1863... 221st May 1863. 3 5th September 1863 410th November 1863] 2nd December 1863. 6 31st December 1863 716th February 1864 Sir F. Rogers Governor Sir H. Robinson 3 Governor Sir H. Robinson His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. Sir F. Rogers... 5 The Acting Governor of Hongkong.. 12 The Acting Governor of Hongkong.. His Grace the Duke of Newcastle 13 The Acting Governor of Hongkong.. His Grace the Duke of Newcastle 13 The Acting Governor of Hongkong. His Grace the Duke of Newcastle 18 His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. Governor Sir H. Robinson 19 8 9th April 1864... Governor Sir H. Robinson His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. 19 912th April 1864.... Governor Sir H. Robinson His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. 24 10 25th June 1864 The Right Honorable E. Cardwell Governor Sir H. Robinson 25 Cette-No. 1.- Copy of DET 14 from Sir F. ROGERS to Governor Sir H. ROBINSON. Downing Street, 25th April, 1863. SIR, You are probably aware that the attention of Her Majesty's Government has been much occupied, during the last two years, by a consideration of the important subject of Colonial Military expenditure, and that an enquiry was instituted by a Committee of the House of Commons whether the most wealthy and important Colonies might not be called upon, with a due regard to justice and to their own interests, to defray a larger proportion of the cost of their Military defence than they had hitherto done. After a thorough examination of the subject, it was decided that those Colonies which, as regards the cost of their Military defence, were more particularly a burden to the Imperial Exchequer should, (allowing of course that the state of their revenues was such as to justify the additional charge), be required considerably to increase their contributions towards that object. In accordance with the decision Ceylon, Mauritius, and the principal Australian Colonies, will be called upon to contribute more liberally towards the support of the several detachments of Her Majesty's Troops which are maintained in those Colonies, chiefly for the protection of Colonial interests. I make these few remarks, by the direction of the Duke of Newcastle, in order that you may be aware of what has already taken place in the matter, and for the purpose of bringing to your notice the fact that Colonies which have never to any great extent involved a heavy charge on the Imperial Treasury, excepting as regards a portion of the cost for their defence, will now be desired partly to relieve the revenues of this Country by making additional contributions in aid of their Military protection. Under these circumstances it is not to be expected that a rich and flourishing Colony like Hongkong should any longer be allowed an immunity from such charges, on this account, as it may so justly be called upon to bear. But before taking any definite action in the matter, His Grace would be glad to be favoured with any remarks which you may have to make, and with this view, and in order that you may be the more easily enabled to furnish any suggestions which may occur to you, it will be necessary that I should briefly review the past and present financial state of the Colony. It would appear, from an examination of all the data bearing on the subject, that, during the first fourteen years of its existence as a Colony, Hongkong cost the Imperial Exchequer no less a sum than £273,000 for its Civil Establishment, exclusive of any sum spent during that period on account of the Military and Naval Protection of the Colony. This very large expense to the mother country, even if the Colonial Revenues were in a far less flourishing condition than they are at present, would of itself be sufficient to impose on the Colony the obligation of a substantial contribution from local funds towards the cost of the Military defence of local interests. From the Official documents in this department, it has also been ascertained that the Colony became self-supporting, so far as its Civil Establishments were concerned, in 1859, and that Imperial aid was then withdrawn. It also appears that in that year £15,000 was expended on Public Works, Roads, &c. The Revenue and Expenditure for the three following years have been as follows:
Baseline (Original)
7. SCHEDULE From. 4 COPY OF CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE COLONIES AND THE GOVERNOR OF HONGKONG UPON THE SUBJECT OF E MILITARY CONTRIBUTION. No. Date. To. Page. SIR, 5 125th April 1863... 221st May 1863. 3 5th September 1863 410th November 1863] 2nd December 1863. 6 31st December 1863 716th February 1804 Sir F. Rogers Governor Sir H. Robinson 3 Governor Sir H. Robinson His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. Sir F. Rogers... 5 The Acting Governor of Hong- kong.. 12 The Acting Governor of Hong- kong.. His Grace the Duke of Newcastle 13 The Acting Governor of Hong- kong.. His Grace the Duke of Newcastle 13 The Acting Governor of Hong- kong. His Grace the Duke of Newcastle 18 His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. Governor Sir H. Robinson 19 8 9th April 1864... Governor Sir H. Robinson His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. 19 912th April 1864.... Governor Sir H. Robinson His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. 24 10 25th June 1864 The Right Honorable E. Cardwell Governor Sir II. Robinson 25 Cette-No. 1.- Copy of DET 14 from Sir F. ROGERS to Governor Sir H. ROBINSON. Downing Street, 25th April, 1863. You are probably aware that the attention of Her Majesty's Government has been much occupied, during the last two years, by a consideration of the important subject of Colonial Military expenditure, and that an enquiry was instituted by a Committee of the House of Commons whether the most wealthy and important Colonies might not be called upon, with a due regard to justice and to their own interests, to defray a larger proportion of the cost of their Military defence than they had hitherto done. After a thorough examination of the subject, it was decided that those Colonies which, as regards the cost of their Military, defence, were more particularly a burden to the Imperial Exchequer should, (allowing of course that the state of their revenues was such as to justify the additional charge), be required considerably to increase their contributions towards that object. In accordance with the decision Ceylon, Mauritius, and the principal Australian Colonies, will be called upon to contribute more liberally towards the support of the several detachments of Her Majesty's Troops which are maintained in those Colonies, chiefly for the protection of Colonial interests. you I make these few remarks, by the direction of the Duke of Newcastle, in order that may be aware of what has already taken place in the matter, and for the purpose of bringing to your notice the fact that Colonies which have never to any great extent involved a heavy charge on the Imperial Treasury, excepting as regards a portion of the cost for their defence, will now be desired partly to relieve the revenues of this Country by making additional contributions in aid of their Military protection. Under these circumstances it is not to be expected that a rich and flourishing Colony like Hongkong should any longer be allowed an immunity from such charges, on this account, as it may so justly be called upon to bear. But before taking any definite action in the matter, His Grace would be glad to be favoured with any remarks which you may have to make, and with this view, and in order that you may be the more easily enabled to furnish any suggestions which may occur to you, it will be necessary that I should briefly review the past and present financial state of the Colony. It would appear, from an examination of all the data bearing on the subject, that, during the first fourteen years of its existence as a Colony, Hongkong cost the Imperial Exchequer no less a sum than £273,000 for its Civil Establishment, exclusive of any sum spent during that period on account of the Military and Naval Protection of the Colony. This very large expense to the mother country even if the Colonial Revenues were in a far less flourishing condition than they are at present, would of itself be sufficient to impose on the Colony the obligation of a substantial contribution from local funds towards the cost of the Military defence of local interests: From the Official documents in this depart- ment it has also been ascertained that the Colony became self-supporting, so far as its Civil Establishments were concerned in 1859, and that Imperial aid was then withdrawn. It also appears that in that year £15,000 was expended on Public Works, Roads, &c. The Revenue and Expenditure for the three following years have been as follows: 101
2026-05-19 07:29:52 · Baseline
View content

7.

SCHEDULE

From.

4

COPY

OF

CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE COLONIES AND THE GOVERNOR OF HONGKONG

UPON THE SUBJECT OF

E MILITARY CONTRIBUTION.

No.

Date.

To.

Page.

SIR,

5

125th April 1863...

221st May 1863.

3 5th September 1863

410th November 1863]

2nd December 1863.

6 31st December 1863

716th February 1804

Sir F. Rogers

Governor Sir H. Robinson

3

Governor Sir H. Robinson

His Grace the Duke of Newcastle.

Sir F. Rogers...

5

The Acting Governor of Hong-

kong..

12

The Acting Governor of Hong-

kong..

His Grace the Duke of Newcastle

13

The Acting Governor of Hong-

kong..

His Grace the Duke of Newcastle

13

The Acting Governor of Hong-

kong.

His Grace the Duke of Newcastle

18

His Grace the Duke of Newcastle.

Governor Sir H. Robinson

19

8

9th April 1864...

Governor Sir H. Robinson

His Grace the Duke of Newcastle.

19

912th April 1864....

Governor Sir H. Robinson

His Grace the Duke of Newcastle.

24

10 25th June 1864

The Right Honorable E. Cardwell Governor Sir II. Robinson

25

Cette-No. 1.-

Copy of DET 14 from Sir F. ROGERS

to Governor Sir H. ROBINSON.

Downing Street, 25th April, 1863. You are probably aware that the attention of Her Majesty's Government has been much occupied, during the last two years, by a consideration of the important subject of Colonial Military expenditure, and that an enquiry was instituted by a Committee of the House of Commons whether the most wealthy and important Colonies might not be called upon, with a due regard to justice and to their own interests, to defray a larger proportion of the cost of their Military defence than they had hitherto done.

After a thorough examination of the subject, it was decided that those Colonies which, as regards the cost of their Military, defence, were more particularly a burden to the Imperial Exchequer should, (allowing of course that the state of their revenues was such as to justify the additional charge), be required considerably to increase their contributions towards that object.

In accordance with the decision Ceylon, Mauritius, and the principal Australian Colonies, will be called upon to contribute more liberally towards the support of the several detachments of Her Majesty's Troops which are maintained in those Colonies, chiefly for the protection of Colonial interests.

you

I make these few remarks, by the direction of the Duke of Newcastle, in order that may be aware of what has already taken place in the matter, and for the purpose of bringing to your notice the fact that Colonies which have never to any great extent involved a heavy charge on the Imperial Treasury, excepting as regards a portion of the cost for their defence, will now be desired partly to relieve the revenues of this Country by making additional contributions in aid of their Military protection.

Under these circumstances it is not to be expected that a rich and flourishing Colony like Hongkong should any longer be allowed an immunity from such charges, on this account, as it may so justly be called upon to bear. But before taking any definite action in the matter, His Grace would be glad to be favoured with any remarks which you may have to make, and with this view, and in order that you may be the more easily enabled to furnish any suggestions which may occur to you, it will be necessary that I should briefly review the past and present financial state of the Colony.

It would appear, from an examination of all the data bearing on the subject, that, during the first fourteen years of its existence as a Colony, Hongkong cost the Imperial Exchequer no less a sum than £273,000 for its Civil Establishment, exclusive of any sum spent during that period on account of the Military and Naval Protection of the Colony. This very large expense to the mother country even if the Colonial Revenues were in a far less flourishing condition than they are at present, would of itself be sufficient to impose on the Colony the obligation of a substantial contribution from local funds towards the cost of the Military defence of local interests: From the Official documents in this depart- ment it has also been ascertained that the Colony became self-supporting, so far as its Civil Establishments were concerned in 1859, and that Imperial aid was then withdrawn. It also appears that in that year £15,000 was expended on Public Works, Roads, &c. The Revenue and Expenditure for the three following years have been as follows:

101

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.